Why this score
The licence is source-available. You can read the code, but it is not an OSI open-source licence. Captured 2026-10-15. Unmeasured signals add nothing and are not treated as failures.
Alive14/20
- Last push. 8 points. GitHub pushed_at was 2 days before 2026-10-15.
- Releases in 12 months. 6 points. The public releases feed shows at least 10 tagged releases in the last 12 months.
- How fast issues close. Not measured. Median issue-close time is not in the seed snapshot, so this signal is omitted.
Trusted2/20
- OpenSSF Scorecard. Not measured. No Scorecard result in the snapshot.
- Open critical or high vulnerabilities. Not measured. Open vulnerability counts were not fetched. We do not assume zero.
- Contributors in 90 days. Not measured. 90-day contributor counts were not fetched.
- Bus factor. Not measured. Contributor share was not fetched.
- Stars. 2 points. 73,516 stars, log-scaled and capped at 20,000.
Takeoverable5.8/25
- Licence. 2 points. Licence class source available.
- Stack. 3.8 points. TypeScript. TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, PHP, and Vue score as widely hireable.
- Tests and CI. Not measured. We did not confirm a test suite. Missing CI at the usual paths is treated as unknown, not as a failure.
- Docs quality. Not measured. Docs quality is an LLM rubric. v1 does not invent that score.
- Data export. Not measured. Data-export was not audited app by app, so it is omitted.
Easy to run5/20
- One-click deploy. Not measured. No one-click host was verified for this app, so the signal is omitted rather than scored as a failure.
- Managed cloud or done-for-you. 5 points. SeatLess offers done-for-you setup. A vendor cloud, where listed, is the vendor’s own hosting, not a licence you own.
- Docker Compose. Not measured. No Dockerfile or Compose file at the usual paths. It may still exist elsewhere, so this is omitted.
- Memory needs. Not measured. Memory needs were not measured.
- Setup steps. Not measured. Setup-step rubric was not run.
Feature fit9.4/15
- Coverage of the incumbent’s main jobs. 9.4 points. Editorial reading of public docs. Not a certified feature audit. Unknown jobs are left out of the average.
What it replaces
AFFiNE mixes documents and a whiteboard. Most of the repo outside the backend is MIT. The backend server licence we read is an enterprise licence: production use requires an AFFiNE subscription. Self-hosting the full product is not “no licence cost.” Caution.
Feature coverage vs Notion
Editorial, from public descriptions. A dash means we did not assess that job. This is not a lab test, and Notion has not reviewed it.
Licence, in plain language
MIT Source-available
You can read the code, and you can often self-host it, but this is not an OSI open-source licence. Hosting it for other companies, or removing licence limits, may be forbidden. Read the file before you depend on it.
Client-side code is MIT. packages/backend/server is AFFiNE’s enterprise licence and requires a subscription for production.
Suggest an edit