Why this score
Usable, but the measured score sits in the middle band. Budget for someone technical. Captured 2026-10-15. Unmeasured signals add nothing and are not treated as failures.
Alive14/20
- Last push. 8 points. GitHub pushed_at was 0 days before 2026-10-15.
- Releases in 12 months. 6 points. The public releases feed shows at least 10 tagged releases in the last 12 months.
- How fast issues close. Not measured. Median issue-close time is not in the seed snapshot, so this signal is omitted.
Trusted8.1/20
- OpenSSF Scorecard. 6.1 points. OpenSSF Scorecard 8.7 out of 10.
- Open critical or high vulnerabilities. Not measured. Open vulnerability counts were not fetched. We do not assume zero.
- Contributors in 90 days. Not measured. 90-day contributor counts were not fetched.
- Bus factor. Not measured. Contributor share was not fetched.
- Stars. 2 points. 46,272 stars, log-scaled and capped at 20,000.
Takeoverable15.7/25
- Licence. 10 points. Licence class permissive.
- Stack. 3.8 points. TypeScript. TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, PHP, and Vue score as widely hireable.
- Tests and CI. 1.9 points. A CI workflow file was found. A test suite was not separately confirmed, so this signal scores half.
- Docs quality. Not measured. Docs quality is an LLM rubric. v1 does not invent that score.
- Data export. Not measured. Data-export was not audited app by app, so it is omitted.
Easy to run5/20
- One-click deploy. Not measured. No one-click host was verified for this app, so the signal is omitted rather than scored as a failure.
- Managed cloud or done-for-you. 5 points. SeatLess offers done-for-you setup. A vendor cloud, where listed, is the vendor’s own hosting, not a licence you own.
- Docker Compose. Not measured. No Dockerfile or Compose file at the usual paths. It may still exist elsewhere, so this is omitted.
- Memory needs. Not measured. Memory needs were not measured.
- Setup steps. Not measured. Setup-step rubric was not run.
Feature fit15/15
- Coverage of the incumbent’s main jobs. 15 points. Editorial reading of public docs. Not a certified feature audit. Unknown jobs are left out of the average.
What it replaces
Rocket.Chat is a Slack-shaped server with channels and a wide set of integrations. The licence file puts code outside the ee directories under MIT. Omnichannel and other commercial pieces live elsewhere in the tree.
Feature coverage vs Slack
Editorial, from public descriptions. A dash means we did not assess that job. This is not a lab test, and Salesforce has not reviewed it.
Licence, in plain language
MIT Permissive
You can use it, change it, and keep your copy, including inside a product you sell, as long as you keep the copyright notice.
MIT outside apps/meteor/ee and ee. Those directories have their own licence.
Suggest an edit